Thursday, April 27, 2006

IBM DISCOVERS WHAT HELYXZION HAS KNOWN FOR 20 YEARS!

04/25/06 -- IBM today announced its researchers have discovered numerous DNA patterns shared by areas of the human genome that were thought to have little or no influence on its function and those areas that do.
As reported today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), regions of the human genome that were assumed to largely contain evolutionary leftovers (called "junk DNA") may actually hold significant clues that can add to scientists' understanding of cellular processes. IBM researchers have discovered that these regions contain numerous, short DNA "motifs," or repeating sequence fragments, which also are present in the parts of the genome that give rise to proteins.
If verified experimentally, the discovery suggests a potential connection between these coding and non-coding parts of the human genome that could have a profound impact on genomic research and provide important insights on the workings of cells.
"Our goal is to apply advanced computational techniques to analyze the workings of processes and systems, in this case the function of the human genome," said Ajay Royyuru, head of the Computational Biology Center at IBM Research "Using these tools, we've been able to shed new light on parts of the DNA that were traditionally thought of as not having a specific purpose. We believe the innovative application of technology can provide further understanding in the life sciences at large."
The IBM team used a mathematical tool called pattern-discovery, often applied to mine useful information from very large repositories of data in both business and scientific applications, to sift through the approximately six billion letters (oh sorry again we here all mistaken about the human genome having 3.1 base pair) in the non-coding regions of the human genome and look for repeating sequence fragments, or motifs.
Among the millions of discovered motifs, the team identified approximately 128,000 that also occur in the coding region of the genome and are significantly over-represented in genes involved in specific biological processes such as cell communication, regulation of transcription, transport and others. In fact, copies of one or more of these motifs can be found in over 90 percent of all known human gene sequences, as well as some genes of other animals where they associate with similar biological processes.
Yes leave it to IBM A corporate giant with the largest array of Supercomputer in the world DISCOVERS WHAT HELYXZION HAS KNOWN FOR 20 YEARS! IT’S NOT JUNK! What IBM refers to was known to be an important part of DNAs form and function 20 years ago by Helyxzion and a few lone researches that The “myth” of junk DNA conjured up by proteomics wizards to explain the fact that some 97% of DNA did not code for protien. This was the junk!


SORRY IBM BUT HELYXZION HAS BEEN DOING THAT FOR 6 YEARS AND WITHOUT THE NEED OF SUPERCOMPUTERS AND 3,000 SCIENTISTS BUT ON A SIGNLE DESK TOP COMPUTER AND THE “ANVIL” VIEWER!

Thursday, April 06, 2006

news from the genetic front

Helyxzion, LLC is pleased to join VDDI, Inc., Telomolecular, Corp. “Combining virutal drug discovery with the best genomics platforms, along with improvements in large-molecule drug delivery and custom protein design opens up new doors of possibility in the treatment of genetic disorders and disease," said Telomolecular CEO Matthew A. Sarad.”, and other industry partners in this critical effort to convert scientific breakthroughs into practical therapies. Simplified access to high-performance computing is a key component of the initiative to develop personalized therapies,” said Dr. Charles Stevens, CEO of Helyxzion. “As genomic analysis becomes economically feasible at a personal level, we see opportunities to bring supercomputing performance to every hospital, every clinic, and every doctor's office. The Helyxzion Consortium can help accelerate these opportunities, bringing real benefits to millions of patients.”

Helyxzion, along with the other Consortium members, are joining forces to improve the speed of drug discovery, gene sequencing and other compute-intensive life-saving therapies to ultimately improve the lives of consumers and give healthcare providers the ability to offer personalized therapies to their patients. This principle of matching a genomic analysis based therapeutic entity to a companion genomically based diagnostic ensures that the right drug is used for the right patient, at the right time for the right cost" said Dr. Stephen Porter, (VDDI, Inc., ) platform strategy advisor to Helyxzion This is true Theranostics. The term itself encompasses many areas such as predictive medicine, personalized medicine, integrated medicine, pharmacodiagnostics and Dx/Rx partnering. Theranostic applications offer a tighter clinical fit between genomic, genetic profiling, medical diagnostics and therapeutic drug treatment. Helyxzion flagship distributed computing product ANVIL, is in use at leading biotech companies in North America, Europe and Asia where the foundations of personalized therapies are being developed today.
“The ability to ‘scale out’ processing is increasingly important for our customers who use computational techniques for life science discovery,” said Dr. Stephen Porter, platform strategy advisor to Helyxzion. “We are glad to be a Helyxzion Consortium partner, as a member of the Consortium and with its expertise in using the ANVIL technology environment to enable rapid application development for these scenarios.”
In addition, the Consortium has begun to capture and annotate data to address proof-of-concept demonstrations in the development of an “anti virus”, which will have a broad spectrum ability to fight many types of virus... As the project progresses, the Consortium will be sharing the code that is developed as well as information on the implementation to help its member companies build applications faster and allow independent biotech companies an affordable distributed computing solution that dramatically improves the speed and performance of demanding real-world biomedical and nanotechnology applications. It is radically easier to buy, and use than any other genomic-computing solutions. Using ANVIL, researches can easily make discoveries and develop applications that will take advantage of the High Performance Computing power of thousands of computers.

Sunday, March 26, 2006

as the future catches you

QUOTE BY: Dr. Juan Enriquez
in his book "AS THE FURURE CATCHES YOU"

THE DOMINANT LANGUAGE... AND ECONOMIC DRIVER.....OF THIS CENTURY....IS GOING TO BE.....GENETICS.
Those who remain illiterate in this language Won't understand the force making the single biggest difference in their lives.

Many countries and companies
just
don't
get it.

WE ARE BEGINNING TO ACQUIRE THE DIRECT AND DELIBERATE CONTROL OVER THE EVOLUTION OF ALL LIFE FORMS ON THE PLANET.

YOUR FUTURE,
THAT OF YOUR CHILDREN,
AND THAT OF YOUR COUNTRY DEPEND ON.....
UNDERSTANDING A GLOBAL ECONOMY DRIVERN BY TECHNOLOGY
UNDERSTANDING CODE, PARTICULARLY GENETIC CODE, IS TODAY'S MOST
POWERFUL TECHNOLOGY
HELYXZION
IS THE MATHEMATICAL, ALGORITHMIC, DIGITAL LANGUAGE OF DNA, RNA, AMINO ACIDS, AND PROTIENS AND PROGRAMMNG LANGUAGE OF LIFE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY.

..ARE ABOUT TO CHANGE...
AGAIN.
THE TWO NUCLEOTIDE BASE PAIRS THAT CODE ALL LIFE….A-T-C-G HAVE ALREADY LED SOME OF THE WORLD’S LARGEST COMPANIES….TO DECARE THAT THEIR FUTURE LIES IN THE LIFE SCIENCE.
NO COUNTRY OR COMPANY WILL SUCCEED….. LET ALONE EXCEL IN THIS FIELD WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING DNA AS A “LANGUAGE’.
HELYXZION IS THE ONLY COMPANY TO DEVELOP A TECHNOLOGY TO DO THIS… IF YOU DON’T BUY IT, LEARN IT AND USE IT, YOU WILL NOT ONLY LOSE IT……YOU'LL NEVER MAKE IT..
Societies and peoples who understand the genetic alphabet...
ARE LIKELY TO LIVE LONGER....
AND GET RICHER.
But most societies do not understand genetic discovery...
Or the challenges that arise from these discoveries...
And that makes them, for all practical purposes.....
Functionally illiterate......
In the language that codes all life on this planet.
DON'T BE ILLITERATE..
MORE IMPORTANT; DON’T LET YOUR CHILDERN BE ILLITERATE…..
GIVE THEM "HELYXZION THE LANGUAGE OF DNA"
GIVE THEM POWER.... WEALTH.... HEALTH.....
THEIR FUTURE DEPENES ON UNDERSTANDING IT!

Wednesday, March 15, 2006

MRI_DNA

MRI/DNA Helyxzion recognizes the market demand and meets the challenge of MRI/DNA imaging diagnosis. Novel imaging protocols are paired with contrast enhancing probes and MAXfel Laser optical excitation to report gene expression and hopefully sequence whole genomes.
By Charles Stevens
Current MRI signals originate from the water molecules in the body. The observed signals rely on the difference of the water environments in the objectives. When such a difference is not obvious, MRI will fail. In this highly demanding areas, such as tumor detections and brain images, MRI can not give any definite information because the differences of water environments are not related to any physiological and pathological conditions. New MRI signaling molecules are urgently needed.

Helyxzion is developing a new set of magnetic signaling molecules for magnetic resonance image (MRI) sequencing diagnostic studies of DNA and large molecule delivery system for genetic therapy.
Helyxzion will develop new sets of signaling molecules for MRI and MRI/DNA Magnetic Resonance Sequencing, Diagnostic and Detection the potential applications of the new signaling molecules include early tumor detections, metabolism images, and body images.
Helyxzion technology is based on the understanding that disease is a genetic process and that a new model for radiology, called molecular imaging, is required for genetic therapies. The methods employed are so sensitive that diseases measured on the genetic level can be detected and corrected before the patient is aware of their symptoms. While conventional medicine of the 20th century treated the effects of disease, genetic medicine in the 21st century, with its complementary DNA sequence imaging techniques, will treat its causes.
DNA imaging (sequencing) answers key clinical questions associated with gene therapies. Through this in vitro medium, clinicians can determine gene defects and in vivo if gene-altering therapies have reached their cellular targets. It reveals the anatomic region where the introduced genes are expressed as well as the onset, magnitude, and duration of expression. Many new molecular therapies are cytostatic, rather than cytotoxic. This means the therapies inhibit cell growth, but they don't kill cells outright, so radiology's mainstay measures of tumor location, diameter, and volume may no longer provide an accurate reading of a patient's condition. The traditional standards for drug dosing are rendered obsolete because genetically targeted therapies may be largely free of side effects. Instead of monitoring physical symptoms, clinicians will use DNA imaging to determine the correct genetic defect and monitor its successful insertion.
MRI/DNA sequencing and 3D imaging would be no more than a fanciful concept without the Helyxzion ANVIL technology to express DNA data graphically and with 3D imaging of the express genome as a digital image of the individual sequenced. Combined with the human genome project completed in 2002, catalogued the sequence of 30,000 genes that make up the human genome. In addition to supplying researchers with the basic ingredients for genetic medicine and imaging, the project created methods and instruments that have accelerated the pace of discovery.
Although DNA sequence imaging may seem exotic, the principles guiding it are familiar to anyone who has practiced nuclear medicine. Many molecular imaging protocols use a radioisotope as a tracer, but even techniques that employ optical or MR imaging modalities rely on some pharmacological means to track the pharmacokinetic properties of the molecular therapies with which they are paired.
DNA imaging differs from conventional techniques, tts designers must overcome cell membrane barriers to deliver the imaging probes to their DNA molecular target minimizing the size and concentration of probe molecules is essential. Typical target concentrations are on pico- or millimolar levels. Because so few molecules are involved, novel strategies must be created to amplify (LASER) the probe's signal to the point that it can be detected.
Whole genome imaging’s best approach is to amplify DNA intracellular, combined it with green fluorescence protein and ex vivo techniques to validate uptake. Researchers have various options when they examine the tissue culture in a petri dish. Fluorescence indicating gene expression ex vivo can be performed before attempting the more costly and technically demanding in vivo imaging techniques.
A radio labeled probe that is selectively phosphorylated in much the same way that fluorodeoxyglucose is phosphorylated by hexokinase. From that starting point, devise strategies to examine DNA in the most straightforward way.
Monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles, an MR contrast agent that is a leading candidate for this role. Each particle comprises about 2000 atoms of iron in a crystalline form wrapped with dextrin. When the dextrin is cross-linked, the particles are called CLIONS (cross-linked iron oxide nanoparticles).
Although this contrast-enhancing behavior can be used to improve the efficacy of MRI for cancer diagnosis, the MGH team plans to report gene expression with the aid of the agent. It has developed vectors that position a therapeutic gene and a transferrin gene side by side in a vector. The expression of the transferrin receptor gene product therefore is a surrogate measure for the expression of the therapeutic gene product.
While the MION protocol is an example of a surface receptor encoding, researchers at the California Institute of Technology are developing MRI contrast agents that become activated at an intracellular level. EgadMe is the most advanced agent thus far developed in this class of selectively activated agents, said Dr. Thomas J. Meade, senior research associate in biology. It consists of a chelator that occupies eight of the nine coordination sites on a gadolinium contrast ion. A galactopyranose residue caps off the remaining coordination site on a gadolinium ion. In this water-inaccessible configuration, the contrast agent is "inactive," meaning it does not affect the T1 times of MRI images.
MRI/DNA Imaging Approaches with Laser Optical Enhancement
Laser Optical imaging will also become an important DNA imaging modality, in part because of new activatable fluorescent contrast agents. Laser Optical imaging uses light waves in a manner similar to x-rays at much higher frequencies. Extremely high spatial resolution is possible with Laser optical imaging, but the clinical value of enhanced coherent Laser has been limited to transparent objects or opaque tissue thinner than 150 mm. With a new generation of fluorescent contrast agents, extending its reach into DNA imaging, in certain chemical configurations, these agents have no effect on the viewed fluorescent image The fluorochromes are unbound after specific enzymatic interaction, however, and these encounters cause them to glow. In some cases, the emission of photons boosts the contrast 1000-fold. This enables target detection with near-infrared fluorescence imaging down to the 10-8 molar concentration level.
The Future
What does this all mean for radiology in 2010? New diagnostic procedures and agents will help identify either the genotype or phenotype of abnormalities in vivo, making cancer combined with in vitro DNA sequencing will make comprehensive diagnosis possible. Breast adenocarcinoma, for example, is thought to be at least two different diseases. It is a safe bet that by 2010, radiologists will be determining optimal therapy by using in vivo LMI and in vitro DNA imaging to identify these unique genetic profiles.
Activatable MR agents will play a major role, researchers at Telomolecular Corp. have a FDA approved large molecules delivery system to penetrate cell membranes and to deal with the high mass levels of probes required to produce sufficient signal for DNA imaging.
Laser enhanced MRI imaging will become prominent because it provides benefits beyond the capabilities of other imaging technologies. "This will be the classic case of early diagnosis with DNA imaging, perhaps before morphologic or clinical phenotypic signs of disease can be seen.
Helyxzion predicts that some of today's mainstream applications will appear quaint 10 years from now. At that time, no one will recommend serial scans separated by three-month intervals to monitor the efficacy of chemotherapy based on the size of a tumor. Instead, Helyxzion foresees that a genetic profile of the patiant will be generated and an Individualized therapeutic plans will be formulated based on genetic profiles.
Serendipity makes accurate prediction difficult, and random events interfere with well-intentioned forecasting. "It is clear; however, that the first DNA imaging to obtain FDA approval for clinical use will be with Laser enhanced MRI.
According to Helyxzion many enabling technologies are contributing to DNA imaging research, , Nano-device engineering, improved data processing are making there mark but the ability to 3D image the sequencing data will prove to be by far the most important.
Helyxzion is seeking business partners to strengthen the company, its manufacture ability and to further develop the MRI technology into clinic applications. The expected investment is between two millions and five millions US dollars. Helyxzion will expect intellectual properties and patents in near future.

Other work being done: Apr 18, 2005
Development of Sequencing Technology
Two grafs on the development of sequencing technology from a recent article in Bioscience Technology.
1) Sequencing technology is "frozen in time", still searching for a breakthrough:
Progress in gene sequencing has arisen more from improved methods than ground-breaking instrumentation. Glenn Schulman, PharmD, marketing manager at 454 Life Sciences (New Haven, CT) points out that gene sequencing technology has become frozen in time circa 2000. “Things pretty much stopped with capillary electrophoresis-based instrumentation,” he says. “There have been incremental improvements, but nothing truly enabling.”
2) Logarithmic Scaling of 454's sequencing-by-synthesis technology (see image)
454’s progress has been phenomenal since it reported its first results, on about 25 base pairs, in late 2001. Since then scale-up has been logarithmic: 33 kbp in 2002, 2.8 Mbp in 2003, and about 20 million bp today (about the size of a bacterial genome) in a 4.5 hour run. Dr. Schulman sees no end in sight to Moore’s Law-type scaling, which could result in sequencing a whole human genome — 30 Gbp — in a matter of days or hours.
AGOWA GmbH is expanding its range of technological facilities in the area of high-throughput DNA analysis with the implementation of the ABI PRISM® 3730 xl. This latest innovation in DNA analyzers is distinguished by shorter runtimes, longer read lengths, increased throughput and also provides excellent data quality. AGOWA has many years experience and a proven excellent reputation for large-scale sequencing as demonstrated by their participation in large-scale national and international sequencing projects. The sequencing service provided by AGOWA combines their experience and state-of- the-art technology with the aim to rapidly deliver to clients best quality at favourable prices. AGOWA is a competent outsourcing partner for clients in industry and research and offers a broad range of services ranging from DNA libraries, automatic picking and spotting of clones, custom sequencing, bioinformatics down to complete genome analysis.

Liquid-State NMR and Scalar Couplings in Microtesla Magnetic Fields
We obtained nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of liquids in fields of a few microtesla, using prepolarization in fields of a few millitesla and detection with a dc superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID). Because the sensitivity of the SQUID is frequency independent, we enhanced both signal-to-noise ratio and spectral resolution by detecting the NMR signal in extremely low magnetic fields, where the NMR lines become very narrow even for grossly inhomogeneous measurement fields. In the absence of chemical shifts, proton-phosphorous scalar (J) couplings have been detected, indicating the presence of specific covalent bonds. This observation opens the possibility for "pure J spectroscopy" as a diagnostic tool for the detection of molecules in low magnetic fields.
Full size image
IBM scientists have achieved a breakthrough in nanoscale magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by directly detecting the faint magnetic signal from a single electron buried inside a solid sample. This achievement is a major milestone toward creating a microscope that can make three-dimensional images of molecules with atomic resolution. Success in this quest should have major impact on the study of materials -- ranging from proteins and pharmaceuticals to integrated circuits and industrial catalysts -- for which a detailed understanding of the atomic structure is essential. Knowing the exact location of specific atoms within tiny nanoelectronic structures, for example, would enhance designers' insight into their manufacture and performance. The ability to directly image the detailed atomic structure of proteins would aid the development of new drugs.
"Throughout history, the ability to see matter more clearly has always enabled important new discoveries and insights," says Daniel Rugar, manager of nanoscale studies at IBM's Almaden Research Center in San Jose, California. "This new capability should ultimately lead to fundamental advancements in nanotechnology and biology." Rugar leads the team of scientists who for more than a decade have been making pioneering advancements in the nanoscale MRI method called magnetic resonance force microscopy (MRFM). His team has improved MRI sensitivity by some 10 million times compared to the medical MRI devices used to visualize organs in the human body. The improved sensitivity extends MRI into the nanometer realm. (A nanometer is a billionth of a meter, the length spanned by about 5-10 atoms.) IBM Research has a distinguished history in developing microscopes for nanoscale imaging and science. Gerd Binnig and Heinrich Rohrer of IBM's Zurich Research Laboratory received the 1986 Nobel Prize in Physics for their invention of the scanning tunneling microscope, which can image individual atoms on electrically conducting surfaces. Binnig later invented the atomic force microscope (AFM), which used the attraction between a cantilever and surface features on non-conducting surfaces. Scientists at IBM and elsewhere modified and extended the AFM design to image surface forces such as magnetism, friction and electrostatic attraction with nanometer resolution. MRFM combines concepts from both AFM and MRI to allow nanometer resolution of features up to 100 nanometers deep inside a sample. The IBM team of Rugar, John Mamin, Raffi Budakian and Benjamain Chui published its single-electron results in the July 15 issue of the scientific journal Nature. This research is funded in part by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Technical details The central feature of an MRFM is a microscopic silicon "microcantilever" that looks like a miniature diving board 1,000 times thinner than a human hair. It vibrates at a frequency of about 5,000 times a second, and attached to the cantilever tip is a tiny but powerful magnetic particle. Isolated ("unpaired") electrons and many atomic nuclei behave like tiny bar magnets. These fundamental units of magnetism are often called "spins." Just as two bar magnets can attract or repel each another, the MRFM’s magnetic tip is attracted or repelled by the spins in the sample. By tuning an oscillating high-frequency magnetic field to the natural precession frequency of the spin being imaged, its magnetic orientation flips back and forth as the cantilever vibrates. Although the magnetic force between the magnetic tip and the spin is exceedingly small (less than a millionth of a trillionth of a pound), the cantilever is so sensitive that the flipping of the spin causes a detectable change in the cantilever’s vibration frequency. While medical MRI looks at groups of at least 1 trillion proton spins, the IBM researchers have just detected the much fainter signal of a single electron spin. The researchers also demonstrated rudimentary (one-dimensional) imaging with 25-nanometer resolution, about 40 times better than the best conventional MRI-based microscopes. Rugar's future research is aimed at further improving the sensitivity, resolution and speed of the MRFM technique so it can detect single protons and other nuclei, such as carbon-13, that can be used to reveal molecular structures. (The magnetic signal of a single electron is about 600 times stronger than that of a single proton.) Applying MRFM to protein structures would be particularly far-reaching. The biological activity of a large protein molecule is determined by its intricately folded atomic configuration. But since such a structure is currently impossible to determine directly, scientists must use indirect methods such as the scattering of x-rays by crystallized proteins, or computer simulations. Advanced MRFMs may also be able to serve as detectors of quantum information in future spin-based quantum computers.

Polymerases for Sequencing by Synthesis

Significant enhancements in gene sequencing may be achieved through implementation of analysis instruments at the same dimensional scale as DNA, i.e., nanometers. Nanotechnology has recently provided the necessary tools to create such nanoinstruments and this proposal seeks to utilize these tools to fabricate a high-speed, low-cost gene sequencer. The gene sequencer is based on the nanopore approach and incorporates tunneling current electrodes to sense the individual nucleotides as they transverse the pore.



DNA Sequencing Using Nanopores

This project, as its R21 milestone, will deliver a combination of conical nanopores having read length dimensions slightly less than 1 nm, and nucleobase-modified DNA oligonucleotides, where the passage of the DNA through the nanopore proceeds with a time constant of 10-100 microseconds per nucleotide, and where the ion current through the nanopore, during the time when the DNA is in transit, varies detectably depending on the nucleotide that is in the pore at the time that the current is measured. This nanopore-modified DNA combination will form the core of an extremely inexpensive technology to generate long reads of DNA sequence at the single molecule level. The research will exploit a decade of experience in the Martin laboratory preparing nanopores and engineering their chemical context, and an equal experience in the Benner laboratory working with nucleic acid analogs, polymerases that accept them, and practical applications of the combination. As specific aims, we shall: (a) prepare the nanotubes; (b) attach chemical functionality to the nanotubes; (c) prepare nucleoside triphosphates carrying different sized polyether dendrimers attached at the 5-position (for pyrimidines) and the 7-position (for 7-deazapurines); (d) use these triphosphates to synthesize modified DNA molecules. The nanopores will then be physically characterized to determine their ion transport dynamics, and in conjunction with the modified oligonucleotides, to find a combination that meets the R21 milestone specifications. If this milestone is passed, the next period will be used to develop sequence specific and randomly targeted primers that incorporate DNA, PNA, and tags that exploit an artificial genetic alphabet, and to develop improved processes for generating conical nanopores in a form suitable for large scale application. These will then be targeted against specific sequences extracted from mammalian genomes.

Polymerases for Sequencing by Synthesis
This project, as its R21 milestone, will deliver Taq DNA polymerases that catalyze the template-directed addition of nucleoside triphosphates carrying large fluorescent groups attached to their 3'-ends. The fluorescent groups therefore both terminate transiently the growth of the oligonucleotide chain, and signal the nature of the nucleotide that was last added. These polymerase variants will form the core of a "cheap reagent" approach to the Sequencing by Synthesis (SbS) strategy. Gaining control over polymerase behavior is key for this approach to generate inexpensive genome-quality sequence data. The research will exploit a decade of experience in the Benner laboratory with nucleic acid analogs, polymerases that accept them, and practical application of the combination. The tactics assume that site-directed mutagenesis is generally site-directed damage, and therefore must be followed by directed evolution to obtain polymerase-substrate combinations that meet specifications. Here, directed evolution will be used to restore catalytic power and fidelity in polymerases that have been engineered to accept fluorescent tags. We shall: (a) synthesize nucleoside triphosphates that have fluorescent blocking groups; (b) use a directed evolution system in water-in-oil emulsions to select polymerases that accept the triphosphates efficiently and faithfully; (c) obtain polymerases to incorporate these to within 10% the catalytic activity of native polymerases, and with specificity to better than one part in 10,000. The next phase of the project will be to develop a working prototype for a multiplexed sequencing-by-synthesis device using these polymerases. The Aims of that phase will be to: (d) optimize the fluorescent compound-cleavage chemistry-polymerase combination; (e) use an artificially expanded genetic information system (AEGIS), the artificial alphabet invented in the Benner group, to bin primer-template combinations for parallel sequencing; and (f) exploit 2D gels to develop an architecture for a prototype parallel sequencing instrument based on the technologies developed in Aims a-c.
Bead-based Polony Sequencing
The goals of this project are to develop a robust sequencing by synthesis methodology for de novo and resequencing applications using the bead-based polony technology. Our overall R & D focus is to address key aspects of the technology that need to be refined to enable robust, high quality polony sequencing. Our experience in large-scale genome sequencing will serve well to ensure that the key issues involved in optimizing the technology against current industry standards, data processing, management, and analysis are effectively addressed in a time- and cost-efficient manner. The specific aims are to:
Develop effective procedures for production of paired-end PCR libraries with virtual insert sizes (distance between read pairs) in the range of 2 to 50 kilobases.
Develop methods for effective solid-phase template amplification on derivatized microspheres and for enrichment of beads containing amplified templates.
Develop methods for robust array preparation.
Develop procedures for fluorescent in situ sequencing by synthesis.
Develop an integrated data acquisition system including fluorescence microscope, automated stage, flow cell, fluidics system and control software.
Develop data management and assembly software.
Develop functional reversible chain terminators.
Develop modified enzymes capable of efficiently incorporating reversible terminators.

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:SLNqxGPANwIJ:www.wiley-vch.de/books/biotech/pdf/v05b_midd.pdf+sequencing+technology&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=32
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=14018
http://www.genome.gov/12513162 more info…

New Technology Will Speed Genome Sequencing
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. -- Almost 150 different genomes have been sequenced to date, including the human genome. But sequencing needs are growing faster than ever: In March 2003, the Bush administration announced it will spend $1 billion over five years to increase forensic analysis of DNA, including a backlog of up to 300,000 samples. And the success of the growing field of genomic medicine, which promises to deliver better therapies and diagnostics, depends on faster sequencing technology.
This fall, researchers at Whitehead Institute will test new technology that could aid these and other endeavors. The BioMEMS 768 Sequencer can sequence the entire human genome in only one year, processing up to 7 million DNA letters a day, about seven times faster than its nearest rival. Scientists began working on the project in 1999 with a $7 million National Human Genome Research Institute grant. The technology eventually will help scientists quickly determine the exact genetic sequence of the DNA of many different organisms, and could lead to faster forensic analysis of DNA gathered in criminal cases.
The heart of the new BioMEMs machine is a large glass chip etched with tiny microchannels called "lanes." It tests 384 lanes of DNA at a time, four times more than existing capillary sequencers. Each lane can accommodate longer strands of DNA: about 850 bases (the nucleic acids found in DNA, abbreviated by the letters A, C, T or G), compared to the current 550 bases per lane.
It takes about 45 minutes to read the DNA from one of the BioMEMS' 768 lanes. The machine has two chips; one is prepared as the other is sequenced, so that the machine is sequencing at all times. The new sequencer saves not just capital costs, the developers say, but day-to-day expenses as well.
"It's not only the cost of the machine, but the cost of the materials it uses," says Brian McKenna, a senior software engineer at Whitehead Institute. The goal, he says, is to use the same amount of consumables -- liquid, chemicals, and other materials used to prepare the DNA -- as existing sequencing machines. BioMEMS also uses a DNA loading process that eventually will need only 1 percent of a typical DNA sample.
While developed at Whitehead, the machine is being commercialized by network biosystems, a company in Woburn, Mass., started in 2001 by Whitehead Member Paul Matsudaira, BioMEMS Labs Director Dan Ehrlich and research scientist Lance Koutny. Shimadzu Biotech in Japan will manufacture the sequencer.
DNA sequencing
How to determine the sequence of bases in a DNA molecule.
DNA sequencing is the process of determining the exact order of the bases A, T, C and G in a piece of DNA. In essence, the DNA is used as a template to generate a set of fragments that differ in length from each other by a single base. The fragments are then separated by size, and the bases at the end are identified, recreating the original sequence of the DNA.
The most commonly used method of sequencing DNA - the dideoxy or chain termination method - was developed by Fred Sanger in 1977 (for which he won his second Nobel prize). The key to the method is the use of modified bases called dideoxy bases; when a piece of DNA is being replicated and a dideoxy base is incorporated into the new chain, it stops the replication reaction.

Key principles:
A DNA molecule carries information in the form of four chemical groups or bases, represented by the letters A, C, G and T. The order of bases on a DNA strand is the DNA sequence.
Most DNA sequencing is carried out using the chain termination method. This involves the synthesis of new DNA strands on a single stranded template and the random incorporation of chain-terminating nucleotide analogues.
The chain termination method produces a set of DNA molecules differing in length by one nucleotide. The last base in each molecule can be identified by way of a unique label. Separation of these DNA molecules according to size places them in the correct order to read off the sequence.

How does it work? The DNA to be sequenced is provided in single-stranded form. This acts as a template upon which a new DNA strand is synthesized. DNA synthesis requires a supply of the four nucleotides (the building blocks of DNA), the enzyme DNA polymerase and a primer (a short sequence annealed to the template which initiates the new DNA strand). The nucleotides added to the growing DNA strand are complementary to those in the template strand.
Sequencing is achieved by including in each reaction a nucleotide analogue that cannot be extended and thus acts as a chain terminator. Four reactions are set up, each containing the same template and primer but a chain terminator specific for A, C, G or T. Because only a small amount of the chain terminator is included, incorporation into the new DNA strand is a random event. Each reaction therefore generates a collection of fragments, but every DNA strand will end at the same type of base (A, C, G or T).
The primers or nucleotides included in each of the four reactions contain different fluorescent labels allowing DNA strands terminating at each of the four bases to be identified. The reaction products are then mixed and separated by gel electrophoresis, which separates DNA molecules according to size even if they differ in length by only a single nucleotide. As the DNA strands pass a specific point, the fluorescent signal is detected and the base identified. The whole process can be extensively automated.
How is it used?The most obvious application of DNA sequencing technology is the accurate sequencing of genes and genomes. Only about 5-800 bases can be sequenced in one experiment so larger DNA molecules, including whole genomes, must be broken into smaller fragments before sequencing and then reassembled by searching for overlaps. Accuracy is achieved by sequencing each template several times.
Lower-fidelity single-pass sequencing is useful for the rapid accumulation of sequence data at the expense of some accuracy. Another application of DNA sequencing technology is resequencing the same DNA molecule over and over. This is necessary, for example, in the typing of single nucleotide polymorphisms.

Saturday, February 25, 2006

the new helyxzion language of dna

HELYXZION AND POST-GENOME DISCOVERYThe DNA of a cell contains all the instructions necessary to recreate life. As such, the sequence of a genome's DNA provides a form of information transfer with its own alphabet (i.e., nucleotides), words (i.e., codons), and sentences (i.e., genes). Thus, the efforts to decode the meaning of DNA sequence is an exercise analogous to that of cryptography seeking to derive meaning from a collection of seemingly randomly recurring symbols.Previous deciphering efforts have been basic and focused on the immediate meaning of a focal sequence. This is akin to the translation of a text on a word-by-word basis. As we advance in this understanding, we start to see higher order meaning through the nuances of gene expression and splice changes. Moreover, the structure and organization of the DNA sequences within and across species provides a clue as to the fundamental rules that governed the creation of life and the understanding of DNA as a true language.Linguistics is a branch of science that has long sought to define the architecture and laws of language structure. There is ample evidence to indicate that both the dimensions and units of linguistic structure appear genetically embedded in the human species. Therefore, the analysis of the structure of language has provided a window into the make-up of the Homo Sapien mind, and perhaps a set of useful strategies to unearth similar structures.Experimentally, therefore, both the disciplines of genomics and linguistics seek to uncover order and information from a sea of noise. Genomics, by virtue of its origins in physical and biological sciences, has had the benefit of rigorous computational tools and laboratory validation in its investigations. Unlike genomics, however, the intuitive understanding of language in all of us permitted linguists to convincingly reconstruct rules governing the transmission of higher order meaning, while unlike cryptography, genomics can use experimental strategies to uncover the relation between form and meaning.The "Helyxzion" Language of DNA will explore the investigative strategies used by these diverse fields of genomics and linguistics in identifying meaning from recurrent strings of information in a multidisciplinary manner touching on linguistics, genomics, computation and molecular biology. The goal will be to synthesize novel conceptual approaches to uncovering higher order meaning from DNA sequence information, to develop a deeper understanding of DNA as a language and explore the possibility of forging novel investigative strategies in genomic research.

the new code of life

The code, the text and the language of DNACommunication between scientists about their work is filled with images. This is inevitable when it comes to explaining complex ideas and concepts that are not directly observable, such as the subatomic particles that comprise a proton or an electron, or the processes inside a cell that lead to the correct formation of a protein. When new discoveries are made, the words to describe them are usually lacking and must be borrowed from the physical world or common speech: lipid rafts, chaperones, molecular markers. When scientists try to explain their findings to the public, or when the media try to make science more palatable to their readers or viewers, these metaphors become even more colorful: cells are factories, proteins carry zip codes, mitochondria are the power-house of the cell, and cells of the immune system go to school.Explaining complex concepts is a creative process and it reveals how scientists think and how ideas about a world too small to grasp are represented in their mind. They accentuate certain aspects of the subject or process they are depicting, while neglecting others. Some-times they even awake associations not intended. When molecules suddenly acquire a personality of their own or are endowed with human goal-directed behavior—take, for example, a molecule that 'finds' a partner or a cell that makes a developmental 'decision', such as committing 'cell suicide'. Using molecular genetics as an example, I will try to follow some of biology's metaphors from their origin in scientific communication into the real world and analyze their impact on the public perception of science.Common language talks about DNA as 'information' or 'a code'. For a very long time, scientists suspected that something—some kind of plan, resided within the sperm and/or egg, such that a snake developed from a snake egg and humans created human offspring. But it was only in the late 1940s and 1950s, when physicists and mathematicians entered the field of molecular biology, that scientists came to interpret this 'something' as information. The complete pattern of the future development of an organism and its function when mature, is contained in the chromosomes in the form of a 'code'. The later discovery of the structure of DNA by Francis Crick and James Watson was a mile stone to the understanding of DNA as a code of some kind that allowed molecules in cells to carry information," in a paper on the implications of their DNA structure, they wrote that "it therefore seems likely that the precise sequence of the bases is the code that carries the genetic information." From today's perspective it seems rather inevitable that, when people started to think about the molecular basis of inheritance. Today, it is hard for a geneticist to picture DNA as anything other than a code that transmits information.Understanding the genome as a coded message, interpreting it as a text, book or language is not so far-fetched. These metaphors convey an important scientific principle: a sequence of a limited assortment of building blocks, like letters in a text, can carry a message. In his book The Language of Life, George Beadle wrote: "... the deciphering of the DNA code has revealed a language... as old as life itself, a language that is the most living language of all". More recently, when scientists celebrated the completion of the first draft of the human genome in 2000, the 'book' and 'language' metaphors were revived—not just reinvented by the press in the service of the public understanding of science, but used by high-ranking scientists involved in the genome project to describe their achievement. On 26 June 2000, when Francis Collins, Director of the National Human Genome Research Institute, announced the completion of the first draft in a major media event at the White House, he said "Today, we celebrate the revelation of the first draft of the human book of life" and declared that this breakthrough lets humans for the first time read "our own instruction book."When H. Gobind Khorana, Marshall W. Nirenberg and other scientists revealed the trinucleotide (now called a codon) correlation between nucleic acids and proteins, this was referred to as 'decoding' or 'deciphering' the code. In fact it only gave science the alphabet and in no way deciphered DNA. this fact becomes very evident when you look at the "state of the art in genetics today. The scientists where able to "HUNT AND PICK AWAY AND FIND THE PROTEINS" (and the term gene today still generally refers to DNA that codes for a Protein) which comprise only about 3% of the genetic information in DNA! WHAT HAPPENED TO THE OTHER 97%? what does it do? why is it there? They just don't know because they don't have the KEY to deciphering DNA. For the scientists involved, these references are clear by context—whether the issue is the DNA sequence itself or the relationship between DNA and protein. But news headlines such as "Decoding the book of life", "Cracking the code of life" or "Breaking the code of life", when referring to the sequencing of the human genome, imply that the decoded text can be read like a novel. In fact HELYXZIONS "ANVIL" (ADVANCED NUCLEOTIDE VISUAL INTERPRETIVE LANGUAGE) DOES JUST THAT!IN SHORT:WATSON & CHICK GAVE US THE STRUCTURE OF DNA.H. Gobind Khorana, Marshall W. Nirenberg revealed the trinucleotide correlation between nucleic acids and proteins.THE GENOME SEQUENCING PROJECT GAVE US THE "TEXT BOOKS".HELYXZIONS ANVIL TECHNOLOGY GIVES US THE ABILITY TO READ "DECIPHER" THE TEXT BOOK.No scientist would dispute that this is NOW the current state of the art. Understanding the message hidden in the 3 billion base pairs of the human genome would require a detailed translation of its sequence into physiological function. DNA itself is a "text with context", genes by themselves barely do anything. Genes just describe how to make proteins, or cease to make them, or regulate their production as directed by other proteins. Not even the basics of protein function at the level of protein folding can be deduced from the genes. It is in the introns that the real information of how intricate protein networks work, that constantly survey the environment outside the cell, monitor metabolic processes and integrate this information into physical function. Deciphering the text as laid down in the genome therefore predict how life works at the cellular and organism level.Today, Helyxzion is learning and reading the language DNA. We are also profoundly humbled by the privilege of turning the pages that describe the miracle of human life, written in the mysterious language of all the ages, the language of DNA.The real implications of "reading" the human genome sequence is just now being realized. This could very well be the turning point in human evolution from a scientific point of view, it could change the role of science, because it introduces human will and intentions into the scientific exercise, after centuries of attempting to free science and research from the limits imposed by religious leaders. In the best case, it provokes sarcasm: In the worst case, it provokes public fear—the idea of the scientists 'playing God' is not too unbelievable. And the public does listen to what the scientists are saying—indeed, public attention to the genome project was unrivalled. In 2000, The New York Times alone published 108 articles related to the Human Genome Project. Was it this outburst in media attention that turned scientists into PR spokesmen and encouraged them to blow their speech out of proportion?Thinking of genes as 'controlling' or 'programming' development dictates a certain view of these processes. "The Helyxzion "ANVIL" describe for us the exact content and structure, not only of each and every gene associated with a species, but also the intron information, that controls a particular gene.With the Helyxzion technology any one with a background knowledge of molecular biology will be able to grasp the sense of sequences easily.Thinking of DNA as a language, information (encompassing both content and structure), a code a text and a chemical structure, all at the same time. The lay reader is overwhelmed with an impression of impact, meaning, prominence, significance and seriousness, but deprived of any means to understand what exactly has been said. Helyxzion allows practitioners to explain their work in simple and easily understandable terms.Moreover, Helyxzion eliminates confusion and misconceptions in Genetics. The potential of genetics is achieved by emphasizing the power of the language and also that of the scientist analyzing it. "Reading, from cover to cover, the first draft of this 'Book of Life'", is exactly what scientists are now capable of doing. Rather, then trying to infer some meaning from small individual chunks of text.The powerful idea that the essence of life is a DNA sequence that scientists are about to read "from cover to cover", means that DNA can be analyzed and manipulated by the scientists, who are therefore taking part in human evolution. Use of this technology in various prenatal genetic diagnosis, gene patenting, the use of genomic markers to predict predisposition to disease, and the use of DNA to identify individuals. Scientists should not indiscriminately use this technology in an exaggerated way. As our parents used to tell us when we were children: "Watch your language!"

the helyxzion report on the language of dna

Helyxzion: The Language of DNAHelyxzion is the newest tool for personal identification. This technology will take all the mystery out of identification. Helyxzion DNA analysis, will convert the human genome into a digitally accrete picture of the person right down to their finger prints, making identification 100% correct. Biochemistry and molecular biology, has, from its origins, found itself in an unlikely arena, a court of law. There is no question that the fundamental issues are complicated, but it is possible to present the bottom line conclusion in such a way that a Ph.D. is not necessary to understand its implications. The two most misunderstood buzzwords, which are apparently discussed at dinner tables and cocktail parties 'round the world, are statistics and the C-word, contamination. (I have had people come up to me on mountain tops and ask me to tell them about contamination!). By the end of this piece, you should at least be able to make better cocktail-party conversation.A Word about Terminology: Fingerprints Come From FingersUnreasonable expectations, as well as undeserved criticisms, have been visited upon the entire DNA identification technology of because of the unfortunate terminology, DNA fingerprinting, applied to the original typing method. In its current state, DNA typing is not directly comparable to fingerprints from fingers (dermatoglyphic fingerprints). In dermatoglyphic fingerprints, it is possible to obtain all of the ridge detail information from all 10 finger pads; thus there are no missing pieces of information. Because only a small portion, perhaps 1 millionth, of the 3 billion units of human DNA are even available for examination by current methods, the result is better compared to a partial fingerprint. Similar to a partial print, however, it may not be necessary to have complete DNA information to be convinced of the individuality of a DNA profile. Just as a certain number of points of comparison have been deemed necessary in order to declare that two fingerprints originated from the same finger, it has been suggested that a defined number of highly polymorphic (variable) DNA loci (chromosomal locations) may be sufficient in order to be convinced that two samples have originated from the same source. One more piece of not-so-trivial information: although identical twins have different fingerprints, in the absence of genetic mutation, the DNA profiles of identical twins are, in fact, identical. More about the DNA of related individuals later.Another Word about Terminology - Burn the "Match"Another word that should be banned from the language of DNA typing is the word match. Along with DNA fingerprinting, it misleads the hapless uninitiated into believing that any test called DNA will unequivocally associate a questioned sample with an exemplar. Until all 3 billion of those genetic units can be easily and reliably analyzed, more appropriate expressions might be the same pattern as, concordant with or indistinguishable from, depending on the strength of the association. The fact that the English language does not provide an easy descriptor of statistical relationships should not detract from the potential power of DNA typing. When many highly variable DNA regions are analyzed, and even the most conservative statistical estimates indicate that not one other person with the same profile exists in the population of the Earth, indistinguishable from becomes one strong statement.The C word: Contamination Much of the opposition to the reliability of DNA evidence always seems to return to the now infamous catch-all term contamination. Other than its negative connotation, what does it really mean? Does it only refer to inadvertently introduced material or might it also be applied to a legitimately mixed sample (e.g. blood from two victims). In fact there are a plethora of different types of contamination, and the final, if any, effect on evidence varies. Among the considerations in determining whether a second DNA type would even be detected is the type of testing involved. For instance, PCR-type testing, where the DNA in the sample is copied millions of times over, is inherently a more sensitive technique than RFLP, which also makes a PCR test more likely to detect traces of a second type, whatever the source. In addition, point of view comes into play - one person's contamination is another's mixed sample; it all depends on what you were expecting and for whom you are advocating.Assuming that the criminalist collecting evidence at the scene isn't bleeding from an open wound, the greatest concern at the crime scene itself is from bacterial, not human, contamination. Crime scene samples, by definition, are in a fertile environment, and fluids like blood and semen provide a very acceptable growth medium for microorganisms. The DNA of the microorganisms themselves is really not a problem - it won't show up in tests that are specific for human DNA. The major concern is degradation of the human DNA in the sample that the bugs are literally using as food. Even so, the DNA type will simply go away, as opposed to being magically converted into someone else's type. Partially degraded DNA must be interpreted carefully by a qualified analyst; if the sample is known to be of poor quality and there is a possibility that part of a pattern has been obscured, a conclusion of "inconclusive" may be the safest bet.Although great care should be taken as a matter of routine, it is really not that easy to interject extraneous human material into a sample. Contrary to what some might have us believe, DNA does not float around randomly in the air, and cells that may be sloughed off or ejected out of a person are relatively few in number and may not contain any consequential DNA. This is not to suggest that precautions not be taken, but to put the matter in some perspective.Once the sample is dried, refrigerated and in the laboratory, the potential for contamination is mostly from other samples undergoing processing at the same time. This is where the training, qualifications of the analyst and quality control of the laboratory come into play. Safeguards are set up not only to guard against contamination from other lab samples, but just as importantly, to detect contaminated samples, should they occur. By the way, the criminalist should remember to wear gloves and not spit in his samples.The biggest real concern that would actually result in an incorrect DNA type, as opposed to NO type, is a sample switch by the analyst. Until computers can process crime scenes, fully analyze samples and take the witness stand, education, and training and good laboratory practice are the best weapons against sample mix-ups.My Brother did it In some DNA typing techniques (not all) a statistical probability is used to estimate the rareness of any particular type - in other words, the possibility that two samples originating from different sources might show the same pattern by chance alone. This type of calculation is valid only with respect to random individuals in a population; it is not applicable to closely related individuals. No two people share the same DNA type except for identical twins. However siblings potentially share more genetic material with each other than anyone else. This is because they inherit their genes from the same two people, Mom and Dad. This idea can be extended to more distant relationships such as children, grandchildren and cousins. In these relationships, some genetic material is shared, but the more distant the relationship, the fewer genes in common. For the highly variable DNA loci that are used in forensic testing, this means that even siblings are unlikely to test the same, especially when many highly variable markers are analyzed. However, until alibis are established all around, your best DNA defense is still "my brother did it..."DNA in the Judicial SystemThe statistical interpretation of DNA typing results, specifically in the context of population genetics, has been the least understood (therefore by definition the most hotly debated) issue of recent admissibility hearings. The perceived incomprehensibility of the subject, fueled by the views of, what some feel, have been only a few outspoken individuals, has led to a recalcitrance of the judicial system to accept DNA typing. California, in particular, has become both a hotbed and testing ground for DNA admissibility issues. With some half-dozen conflicting appellate opinions, the California Supreme Court has recently moved to review three recent decisions, and come to a consensus as to whether DNA testing is generally accepted in the relevant community, and may be routinely admitted in criminal trials.

Friday, November 04, 2005

the language of dna

The code, the text and the language of DNA
Communication between scientists about their work is filled with images. This is inevitable when it comes to explaining complex ideas and concepts that are not directly observable, such as the subatomic particles that comprise a proton or an electron, or the processes inside a cell that lead to the correct formation of a protein. When new discoveries are made, the words to describe them are usually lacking and must be borrowed from the physical world or common speech: lipid rafts, chaperones, molecular markers. When scientists try to explain their findings to the public, or when the media try to make science more palatable to their readers or viewers, these metaphors become even more colorful: cells are factories, proteins carry zip codes, mitochondria are the power-house of the cell, and cells of the immune system go to school.
Explaining complex concepts is a creative process and it reveals how scientists think and how ideas about a world too small to grasp are represented in their mind. They accentuate certain aspects of the subject or process they are depicting, while neglecting others. Some-times they even awake associations not intended. When molecules suddenly acquire a personality of their own or are endowed with human goal-directed behavior—take, for example, a molecule that 'finds' a partner or a cell that makes a developmental 'decision', such as committing 'cell suicide'. Using molecular genetics as an example, I will try to follow some of biology's metaphors from their origin in scientific communication into the real world and analyze their impact on the public perception of science.

Common language talks about DNA as 'information' or 'a code'. For a very long time, scientists suspected that something—some kind of plan, resided within the sperm and/or egg, such that a snake developed from a snake egg and humans created human offspring. But it was only in the late 1940s and 1950s, when physicists and mathematicians entered the field of molecular biology, that scientists came to interpret this 'something' as information. The complete pattern of the future development of an organism and its function when mature, is contained in the chromosomes in the form of a 'code'. The later discovery of the structure of DNA by Francis Crick and James Watson was a mile stone to the understanding of DNA as a code of some kind that allowed molecules in cells to carry information," in a paper on the implications of their DNA structure, they wrote that "it therefore seems likely that the precise sequence of the bases is the code that carries the genetic information." From today's perspective it seems rather inevitable that, when people started to think about the molecular basis of inheritance. Today, it is hard for a geneticist to picture DNA as anything other than a code that transmits information.
Understanding the genome as a coded message, interpreting it as a text, book or language is not so far-fetched. These metaphors convey an important scientific principle: a sequence of a limited assortment of building blocks, like letters in a text, can carry a message. In his book The Language of Life, George Beadle wrote: "... the deciphering of the DNA code has revealed a language... as old as life itself, a language that is the most living language of all". More recently, when scientists celebrated the completion of the first draft of the human genome in 2000, the 'book' and 'language' metaphors were revived—not just reinvented by the press in the service of the public understanding of science, but used by high-ranking scientists involved in the genome project to describe their achievement. On 26 June 2000, when Francis Collins, Director of the National Human Genome Research Institute, announced the completion of the first draft in a major media event at the White House, he said "Today, we celebrate the revelation of the first draft of the human book of life" and declared that this breakthrough lets humans for the first time read "our own instruction book."

When H. Gobind Khorana, Marshall W. Nirenberg and other scientists revealed the trinucleotide (now called a codon) correlation between nucleic acids and proteins, this was referred to as 'decoding' or 'deciphering' the code. In fact it only gave science the alphabet and in no way deciphered DNA. this fact becomes very evident when you look at the "state of the art in genetics today. The scientists where able to "HUNT AND PICK AWAY AND FIND THE PROTEINS" (and the term gene today still generally refers to DNA that codes for a Protein) which comprise only about 3% of the genetic information in DNA! WHAT HAPPENED TO THE OTHER 97%? what does it do? why is it there? They just don't know because they don't have the KEY to deciphering DNA. For the scientists involved, these references are clear by context—whether the issue is the DNA sequence itself or the relationship between DNA and protein. But news headlines such as "Decoding the book of life", "Cracking the code of life" or "Breaking the code of life", when referring to the sequencing of the human genome, imply that the decoded text can be read like a novel. In fact HELYXZIONS "ANVIL" (ADVANCED NUCLEOTIDE VISUAL INTERPRETIVE LANGUAGE) DOES JUST THAT!
IN SHORT:
WATSON & CHICK GAVE US THE STRUCTURE OF DNA.
H. Gobind Khorana, Marshall W. Nirenberg revealed the trinucleotide correlation between nucleic acids and proteins.
THE GENOME SEQUENCING PROJECT GAVE US THE "TEXT BOOKS".
HELYXZIONS ANVIL TECHNOLOGY GIVES US THE ABILITY TO READ "DECIPHER" THE TEXT BOOK.

No scientist would dispute that this is NOW the current state of the art. Understanding the message hidden in the 3 billion base pairs of the human genome would require a detailed translation of its sequence into physiological function. DNA itself is a "text with context", genes by themselves barely do anything. Genes just describe how to make proteins, or cease to make them, or regulate their production as directed by other proteins. Not even the basics of protein function at the level of protein folding can be deduced from the genes. It is in the introns that the real information of how intricate protein networks work, that constantly survey the environment outside the cell, monitor metabolic processes and integrate this information into physical function. Deciphering the text as laid down in the genome therefore predict how life works at the cellular and organism level.

Today, Helyxzion is learning and reading the language DNA. We are also profoundly humbled by the privilege of turning the pages that describe the miracle of human life, written in the mysterious language of all the ages, the language of DNA.

The real implications of "reading" the human genome sequence is just now being realized. This could very well be the turning point in human evolution from a scientific point of view, it could change the role of science, because it introduces human will and intentions into the scientific exercise, after centuries of attempting to free science and research from the limits imposed by religious leaders. In the best case, it provokes sarcasm: In the worst case, it provokes public fear—the idea of the scientists 'playing God' is not too unbelievable. And the public does listen to what the scientists are saying—indeed, public attention to the genome project was unrivalled. In 2000, The New York Times alone published 108 articles related to the Human Genome Project. Was it this outburst in media attention that turned scientists into PR spokesmen and encouraged them to blow their speech out of proportion?
Thinking of genes as 'controlling' or 'programming' development dictates a certain view of these processes. "The Helyxzion "ANVIL" describe for us the exact content and structure, not only of each and every gene associated with a species, but also the intron information, that controls a particular gene.
With the Helyxzion technology any one with a background knowledge of molecular biology will be able to grasp the sense of sequences easily.
Thinking of DNA as a language, information (encompassing both content and structure), a code a text and a chemical structure, all at the same time. The lay reader is overwhelmed with an impression of impact, meaning, prominence, significance and seriousness, but deprived of any means to understand what exactly has been said. Helyxzion allows practitioners to explain their work in simple and easily understandable terms.

Moreover, Helyxzion eliminates confusion and misconceptions in Genetics. The potential of genetics is achieved by emphasizing the power of the language and also that of the scientist analyzing it. "Reading, from cover to cover, the first draft of this 'Book of Life'", is exactly what scientists are now capable of doing. Rather, then trying to infer some meaning from small individual chunks of text.
The powerful idea that the essence of life is a DNA sequence that scientists are about to read "from cover to cover", means that DNA can be analyzed and manipulated by the scientists, who are therefore taking part in human evolution. Use of this technology in various prenatal genetic diagnosis, gene patenting, the use of genomic markers to predict predisposition to disease, and the use of DNA to identify individuals. Scientists should not indiscriminately use this technology in an exaggerated way. As our parents used to tell us when we were children: "Watch your language!"

Thursday, November 03, 2005

hidden language of DNA

Hidden Language in DNA

Comparison between the statistical properties of coding and non-coding DNA sequences has been interpreted as indicating a yet-undiscovered language in non-coding DNA.

This statement is decades old, there is a language in DNA and not just in non-coding regions of DNA. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “JUNK OR NON-CODING DNA”.
We argue that greater variance among nucleotide frequencies in ALL regions explains this assertion. DNA sequences are long strings composed of codons (four nucleotides A, C, G, and T). For a statistical analysis, these strings make “words” of fixed length n.
Then the word frequencies, of non-Protein coding DNA was shown to be non-zero (as in natural languages) and significantly larger than that of protein coding DNA. however, this simply reflects that nucleotide frequencies are more unequal in non-protein coding than in protein coding DNA; R 1 increases as the variance of the p distribution increases. The increase in R n as n increases is the same for all DNA and thus does not distinguish between them. Further more, it can be shown that correlations of finite range simply an increasing R n even for n. Which in short argue that a language simply must arise or DNA could not unfailingly impart any use information either from cell to cell or across generations of organisms?
According to their frequencies, p, from most to least frequent, visible by a linear region in a double-logarithmic plot. The slope for non-protein coding DNA was found to be larger than that for protein coding DNA, and close to that of English text, as analyzed the Helyxzion “ANVIL” method and fixed word length was taken as further evidence that “all” regions are similar to natural languages.
Helyxzion ANVIL analysis shows that intron coding regions are not random strings of nucleotides, independently drawn according to the observed nucleotide frequencies. For equal frequencies, all n-codons have equal probability 4 2n. However, as the nucleotide frequencies become more uneven, increasingly distinct DNA appears for finite sequence length a random sequence of identical length and nucleotide frequencies. Considering the crudeness of the approximation, these curves are strikingly similar. Secondly, the most probable “DNA words” are not very different from those of natural languages. Like English, where the most common words are “the,” “of,” “and,” etc., in the present DNA example they are combinations of only the most probable letters—TTTTTT, AAAAAA,
TTTTTA, etc. That these words occur more often than expected for uncorrelated random sequences, Can be readily explained by unequal crossing over, which preferentially occurs in regions of short repeats.
Thirdly, the linguistic approach has not been doubted for a long time: Even randomly generated “Text” (with words of different length) exhibits language behavior with an exponent close to that of natural Languages. We have thus shown all of the observations are simple consequences of nucleotide frequencies. Our explanation of the existence of a language in DNA would not be complete with out knowing that it is not base on guess work but well founded in the underlying “MATHMATICS DICOVERED IN DNA”.

the code

The code, the text and the language of DNA
Communication between scientists about their work is filled with images. This is inevitable when it comes to explaining complex ideas and concepts that are not directly observable, such as the subatomic particles that comprise a proton or an electron, or the processes inside a cell that lead to the correct formation of a protein. When new discoveries are made, the words to describe them are usually lacking and must be borrowed from the physical world or common speech: lipid rafts, chaperones, molecular markers. When scientists try to explain their findings to the public, or when the media try to make science more palatable to their readers or viewers, these metaphors become even more colorful: cells are factories, proteins carry zip codes, mitochondria are the power-house of the cell, and cells of the immune system go to school.
Explaining complex concepts is a creative process and it reveals how scientists think and how ideas about a world too small to grasp are represented in their mind. They accentuate certain aspects of the subject or process they are depicting, while neglecting others. Some-times they even awake associations not intended. When molecules suddenly acquire a personality of their own or are endowed with human goal-directed behavior—take, for example, a molecule that 'finds' a partner or a cell that takes a developmental 'decision', such as committing 'cell suicide'. Using molecular genetics as an example, I will try to follow some of biology's metaphors from their origin in scientific communication into the real world and analyze their impact on the public perception of science.Common language talks about DNA as 'information' or 'a code'. For a very long time, scientists suspected that something—some kind of plan, specificity or driving force—resided within the sperm and/or egg, such that a snake developed from a snake egg and humans created human offspring. But it was only in the late 1940s and 1950s, when cyberneticists, physicists and mathematicians entered the field of molecular biology, that scientists came to interpret this 'something' as information. The complete pattern of the future development of an organism and its function when mature, is contained in the chromosomes in the form of a 'code'. The later discovery of the structure of DNA by Francis Crick and James Watson was a mile stone to the understanding of DNA as a code of some kind that allowed molecules in cells to carry information," in a paper on the implications of their DNA structure, they wrote that "it therefore seems likely that the precise sequence of the bases is the code that carries the genetic information." From today's perspective it seems rather inevitable that, when people started to think about the molecular basis of inheritance. Today, it is hard for a geneticist to picture DNA as anything other than a code that transmits information.When H. Gobind Khorana, Marshall W. Nirenberg and other scientists revealed the trinucleotide code and the correlation between nucleic acids and proteins, this was referred to as 'decoding' or 'deciphering' the code. These metaphors have gained momentum and are now routinely used to describe the sequencing of the human genome. For the scientists involved, these references are clear by context—whether the issue is the DNA sequence itself or the relationship between DNA and protein. But news headlines such as "Decoding the book of life", "Cracking the code of life" or "Breaking the code of life", when referring to the sequencing of the human genome, imply that the decoded text can be read like a novel. In fact HELYXZIONS "ANVIL" (ADVANCED NUCLEOTIDE VISUAL INTERPRETIVE LANGUAGE) DOES JUST THAT!
No scientist would dispute that this is NOW the current state of the art. Understanding the message hidden in the 3 billion base pairs of the human genome would require a detailed translation of its sequence into physiological function. DNA itself is a "text with context", genes by themselves barely do anything. Genes just describe how to make proteins, or cease to make them, or regulate their production as directed by other proteins. Not even the basics of protein function at the level of protein folding can be deduced from the genes. It is in the introns that the real information of how intricate protein networks work, that constantly survey the environment outside the cell, monitor metabolic processes and integrate this information into physical function. Deciphering the text as laid down in the genome therefore predict how life works at the cellular and organism level.
Understanding the genome as a coded message, interpreting it as a text, book or language is not so far-fetched. These metaphors convey an important scientific principle: a sequence of a limited assortment of building blocks, like letters in a text, can carry a message. In his book The Language of Life, George Beadle wrote: "... the deciphering of the DNA code has revealed a language... as old as life itself, a language that is the most living language of all". More recently, when scientists celebrated the completion of the first draft of the human genome in 2000, the 'book' and 'language' metaphors were revived—not just reinvented by the press in the service of the public understanding of science, but used by high-ranking scientists involved in the genome project to describe their achievement. On 26 June 2000, when Francis Collins, Director of the National Human Genome Research Institute, announced the completion of the first draft in a major media event at the White House, he said "Today, we celebrate the revelation of the first draft of the human book of life" and declared that this breakthrough lets humans for the first time read "our own instruction book." Today, Helyxzion is learning and reading the language DNA. We are also profoundly humbled by the privilege of turning the pages that describe the miracle of human life, written in the mysterious language of all the ages, the language of DNA.The real implications of "reading" the human genome sequence is just now being realized. This could very well be the turning point in human evolution from a scientific point of view, it could change the role of science, because it introduces human will and intentions into the scientific exercise, after centuries of attempting to free science and research from the limits imposed by religious leaders. In the best case, it provokes sarcasm: In the worst case, it provokes public fear—the idea of the scientists 'playing God' is not too unbelievable. And the public does listen to what the scientists are saying—indeed, public attention to the genome project was unrivalled. In 2000, The New York Times alone published 108 articles related to the Human Genome Project. Was it this outburst in media attention that turned scientists into PR spokesmen and encouraged them to blow their speech out of proportion?
Thinking of genes as 'controlling' or 'programming' development dictates a certain view of these processes. "The Helyxzion "ANVIL" describe for us the exact content and structure, not only of each and every gene associated with a species, but also the intron information, that controls a particular gene.
With the Helyxzion technology any one with a background knowledge of molecular biology will be able to grasp the sense of sequences easily.
Thinking of DNA as a language, information (encompassing both content and structure), a code a text and a chemical structure, all at the same time. The lay reader is overwhelmed with an impression of impact, meaning, prominence, significance and seriousness, but deprived of any means to understand what exactly has been said. Helyxzion allows practitioners to explain their work in simple and easily understandable terms.Moreover, Helyxzion eliminates confusion and misconceptions in Genetics. The potential of genetics is achieved by emphasizing the power of the language and also that of the scientist analyzing it. "Reading, from cover to cover, the first draft of this 'Book of Life'", is exactly what scientists are now capable of doing. Rather, then trying to infer some meaning from small individual chunks of text.
The powerful idea that the essence of life is a DNA sequence that scientists are about to read "from cover to cover", means that DNA can be analyzed and manipulated by the scientists, who are therefore taking part in human evolution. Use of this technology in various prenatal genetic diagnosis, gene patenting, the use of genomic markers to predict predisposition to disease, and the use of DNA to identify individuals. Scientists should not indiscriminately use this technology in an exaggerated way. As our parents used to tell us when we were children: "Watch your language!"

post-genome discovery

HELYXZION AND POST-GENOME DISCOVERY
The DNA of a cell contains all the instructions necessary to recreate life. As such, the sequence of a genome's DNA provides a form of information transfer with its own alphabet (i.e., nucleotides), words (i.e., codons), and sentences (i.e., genes). Thus, the efforts to decode the meaning of DNA sequence is an exercise analogous to that of cryptography seeking to derive meaning from a collection of seemingly randomly recurring symbols.
Previous deciphering efforts have been basic and focused on the immediate meaning of a focal sequence. This is akin to the translation of a text on a word-by-word basis. As we advance in this understanding, we start to see higher order meaning through the nuances of gene expression and splice changes. Moreover, the structure and organization of the DNA sequences within and across species provides a clue as to the fundamental rules that governed the creation of life and the understanding of DNA as a true language.
Linguistics is a branch of science that has long sought to define the architecture and laws of language structure. There is ample evidence to indicate that both the dimensions and units of linguistic structure appear genetically embedded in the human species. Therefore, the analysis of the structure of language has provided a window into the make-up of the Homo Sapien mind, and perhaps a set of useful strategies to unearth similar structures.
Experimentally, therefore, both the disciplines of genomics and linguistics seek to uncover order and information from a sea of noise. Genomics, by virtue of its origins in physical and biological sciences, has had the benefit of rigorous computational tools and laboratory validation in its investigations. Unlike genomics, however, the intuitive understanding of language in all of us permitted linguists to convincingly reconstruct rules governing the transmission of higher order meaning, while unlike cryptography, genomics can use experimental strategies to uncover the relation between form and meaning.
The "Helyxzion" Language of DNA will explore the investigative strategies used by these diverse fields of genomics and linguistics in identifying meaning from recurrent strings of information in a multidisciplinary manner touching on linguistics, genomics, computation and molecular biology. The goal will be to synthesize novel conceptual approaches to uncovering higher order meaning from DNA sequence information, to develop a deeper understanding of DNA as a language and explore the possibility of forging novel investigative strategies in genomic research.

potential impact

Helyxzions Potential impact
Strategic impact
By the early 1970s, a puzzling set of observations emerged, that mRNAs in the Cytoplasm were found to be much shorter than their nuclear RNA counterparts. Researcher found the answer in 1977 with the discovery of RNA splicing. Most higher eukaryotes mRNAs (incl. of human) are encoded in the genome in a hyphenated form. Blocks of protein-coding sequences, called exons, are separated by intervening sequences, called introns. The primary transcripts a copy of the entire gene, containing introns as well as exons. The introns are then removed in a process called pre-mRNA splicing. Our genome exists more than 96 % OF INTRONS, which means that more than 96 % of human genome has non-coding information, but now researchers in US and Europe are sure, that there is a lot of information, it is just a puzzle, based on understanding splicing and the so called alternative splicing process. Splicing also offers cells an opportunity to “customize”gene products to meet different specialized needs. Alternative splicing is a mechanism in which the use of different splice donor and /or acceptor sites allows for the production, from a single gene, of multiple mRNAs with partly overlapping genetic information, each encoding a distinct polypeptide. It is the basic mechanism that different tissues produce specialized forms of particular proteins, which makes it so important for understanding diseases like Breast Cancer, Muscular Dystrophy, Friedreich Ataxia and so on.
Additional to these important cell processes, this proposed project offers a strategic scheme to described two very basic systems (alternative splicing and NMD) in a point of intersection between cell signalling pathways, called apoptosis. This field is called the scientific eye in cellular biology, because it is carry at least some parts of the secret of cell structure, cell cycle, and, of course, human diseases.
Coordinate key researchers of different disciplines in this project network Research focus on fundamental biological process of cells The project carries many parts of the secret of cell structure, cell cycle and Of human diseases Using Breast Cancer and Muscular Dystrophy as tissue model for studying Fundamental biological process Receive answers on the functions and molecular mechanisms leading to the Disease and the Development of databases for scientists, physicians and patients
An impact contribution to establish a critical mass of potential excellence, by networking the capacities present in different Member States. And by attracting to Europe the best researchers from the rest of the world
The European Research Area (ERA) was proposed by the Commission in January 2000.
It should be focused on specific themes that are strategically important to Europe’s future. The themes have been devised in the light of political debate, expert advice, and public consultation. They are not structured from the starting point of traditional research disciplines, but as strategic themes that will be achieved through combinations of scientific disciplines.
Our project is qualified to create a European centre of excellence through the collaboration of leading laboratories and companies in the respective fields, located in Vienna, Cambridge, Leiden, Berlin, Budapest, Jerusalem,
We coordinate key researchers of different disciplines from different geographical areas and countries in this project network. Such high quality networks stimulate creativity and make Europe more attractive for top researchers. This will be an important impact to strengthen the European competitiveness.
Technology Impact
The project’s consortium integrates unique technologies and systems to investigate three important functional genetic mechanism,, in general cell biological process and their influence especially on Breast Cancer and Muscular Dystrohy. The dissemination of these technologies and its further development to young researchers will be achieved by an exchange of tools, know-how and researches organized by the partners. The partner 4,and 8 are reference centres for the genetic research, which have set up quality controls and standardized techniques according to French healthcare legislation. The database represent a unique tool collecting all pathway interactions which we will identify within the consortium and reported in the literature. Further developments of this database are planned in this project.
The development of crystallization and X-ray structure analyses (UA) of proteins and proteins-interaction represents a new technology currently not pursued in any other lab worldwide. Furthermore, the proposed development of an posttranslational adpoptosis array in using lipid-coated surfaces is a highly innovative approach that will promote future studies on different diseases. uniquely available in our consortium,
will promote the development of further disease models for testing therapeutic strategies. Our industrial partner Biochemicon is uniquely positioned to move rapidly and cost effectively from a described cell process to the identification of drug targets and of drugs effective in reversing a pathological phenotype, through its NEW Bioinformatic tools throughput pharmacology screening platform. The idea to develop a specific intracellular carrier For study NMD and alternative splicing in diseases like BC and MD will catapult the knowledge about these diseases.
Impact on the Regional and European Economy
Specific project outputs (theranostic tools) address large market areas of the world economy, in vitro diagnostics and health care. The total world market for molecular diagnostics (MDx) was approximately 1.5 Beuro in 2000 and is projected to grow to 4.7 Beuro by 2005 and 16,800 Beuro by 2010. Diagnostic assays we intend to develop will not only feed into Molecular Diagnostics (MDx), but also into other major market segments, e.g. Point-Health-of-Care (PHOC) testing, clinical chemistry, and theranostics.
Splicin, and alternative splicing also impact on key areas of market opportunities – cardiovascular, cancer, neurological and metabolic disease, thus moving into mainstream health care areas. In order to be able to exploit the commercial potential from this development for the EU, it is important for SMEs to be fully integrated in those areas of expertise needed to develop pre-commercial findings into therapeutics. The size of the final market will ultimately be dictated by the extent to which pathways and new pharmaceutical targets will be found to have a role in more common multifactorial diseases and the extent to which insights from the rare monogenic diseases are informative therapeutically for the more common polygenic conditions. For example, while familial partial lipodystrophy in itself is rare and not a commercially attractive disease to study, the application of pharmacological tools used in normal adipose biology, leads into a multibillion Euro market. By integrating the SMEs at ground level as in our project, the EU will be at the forefront of exploiting this area on the world stage in disease areas with current massive unmet needs.
Impact on European Policy
The ‘Lisbon’ economic objectiveThe Lisbon European Council Summit held on in March 2000 set an objective to ‘make the European Union the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world by 2010’. This has since been interpreted as requiring focused community-wide investment in research, and the improvement of innovation and entrepreneurship.
The European Research AreaThe European Research Area (ERA) was proposed by the Commission in January 2000. It has since been endorsed by the Heads of State and Government, and is now the major research policy debate in Europe.
Commissioner Philippe Busquin, the architect of the ERA, described it as “The development, at European level, of an area for the coherent and co-ordinated pursuit of research activities and policies, and an area in which researchers and knowledge move freely will encourage the expression of European excellence in several ways: First, by making it possible to establish a 'critical mass' of potential excellence, by networking the capacities present in different Member States, particularly through intensive use of information and communication technologies. Second, by releasing people and teams from the protection of national barriers, thus introducing competition and increasing the general level of excellence. Third, by attracting to Europe the best researchers from the rest of the world, in the same way that American campuses are currently attracting researchers.”
Our proposal fits well in accordance with point 1, 2 and 3, because of our project partners, which present a multi member community of Europe, there excellent experience in their specific field, and the statement of the problem of our project is a fundamental statement in many different areas. Therefore to find more information about it will bring a huge impact in different research areas and will attracting the best researchers from the rest of the world. The European Commission decided on 25 February 2004 on the work plan for the Implementation of the programme of Community action in the field of public health (2003 to 2008) (2004/192/EC). The general objectives of this programme are public healthcare Programmes: i) to improve information and knowledge for the development of public health;
ii) To enhance the capability of responding rapidly and in a coordinated fashion the health Threats; and iii) to promote health and prevent disease. Our project is well in accordance with Point i) and iii) by aiming at identifying molecular disease mechanisms, identifying drug Targets and developing therapeutic applications for genetic diseases, as well as to offer An information platform for physicians to diagnose such diseases at early disease stages.
Impact on Regional and European Environment
It is particularly important in a new and rapidly developing health care-relevant field to both Reassure the general public that the technology and therapies to be developed have no negative Effects on their safety and well-being and as little negative effects as possible on the Environment. In this present project toxicological and biocompatibility considerations relating To project outputs are of primary concern. The developed diagnostic targets will support studies on novel therapeutics drugs permitting the evaluation of the efficacy/toxicity of a candidate.
Commissioner Philippe Busquin, the architect of the ERA, described one of the most important impacts as “Attracting to Europe the best researchers from the rest of the world, in the same way that American campuses are currently attracting researchers.”
Social Impact (jobs, education, quality of life)
Education: It is our intention to inform and educate Society with respect to project outputs (knowledge, therapies, drugs) through communication with all interest groups at all educational levels. his will be accomplished via a variety of routes: hard copy publications (news media, scientific meetings, scientific and popular publications), and the construction and maintenance of a project-related websites. The obtained results will also support an internationally competitive high level academic education in the respective fields.
Quality of Life:
The project’s major and ultimate goals, the identification of drug targets and drugs for therapeutic applications in patients is clearly heading towards improvement the quality of life of patients, by reducing some of most of the pathological phenotypes often posing major risk factors for life. While the potential treatment strategies for these diseases are not clearly foreseeable at the moment and will depend on the results of our project, pathogenic secondary defects can already be treated with existing drugs that have already been tested in patients. However, our attempts to follow the efficiency of therapies by developing and using tools is expected to allow further adjustments of the therapy protocol for specific patient groups, thus increasing the efficiency of therapies and reducing the risks. This will of course have a major impact of the quality of patients’ life. Furthermore, finding new approaches for the treatment BC and MD will broaden and improve strategies for treating in other diseases. This project will also contribute indirectly to the healthcare of EU citizens through development of improved and more cost-effective methodologies for identification of inherited genetic diseases and cellular analysis for treatment.
Finally, the benefit of our project not only lies in the development of improved diagnosis and treatment of diseases leading to improved well-being of patients, but also subsequent suffering at the individual or societal level can be lowered (e.g. loss of income due to sick leave, ability to participate in recreational activities, and general mental health). Employment market: Through the integration of SMEs and the hiring of research personal, the project will create new jobs.
Exploitation and dissemination of results
The project’s consortium integrates all relevant competencies to address innovation related aspects, such as technology transfer, intellectual property rights (IPR), clinical trials, etc., ensuring optimal use of the generated knowledge. We have reserved more than 40%of the budget to a group of cutting edge research SMEs. They will develop new technologies for studying Cell-function and drug testing and drug target identification with minimal amounts of chemicals, being thus highly cost effective, which is particularly relevant for studying rare diseases. New findings will be commercially exploited through patenting and licensing. All tools and reports published by the teams in the consortium will be pre-screened by an IPR advisory team collaborating with the management group of our consortium (Multi Lingual)
Contributions to standards
Standardisation and quality in this project is an important issue. Genetic screening of patient material performed at Inserm has to follow standardized techniques according to French healthcare legislation.
Of course resaerch and strategies in natural science, therapeutic treatment and evaluation of therapy responses have to be done in a standardized manner. Therefore, the consortium shall form a Standards Group from individuals from the partner institutions with experience in „complex organisation standardisation’ of working practices, manufacturing processes and product quality. Its responsibility shall be two fold.
• By direct monitoring of workpackages and production of written specifications of working practices and evaluation procedures it will ensure standardisation of processes and outputs from the project and therefore transferability. This will enhance Partner confidence in project outputs in terms of their quality and ultimately the success of the project as a whole.
• This will promote EU standardisation issues by supporting existing standardisation legislation and promoting the introduction of new codes where none currently exist or are developed.